Home | FaHCSIA | DEEWR | DIISRTE | AGD | Contact us
 
FA Guide Contents Using the Guide What's New 1 Key Terms & Principles 2 Eligibility 3 Rate Calculation 4 Claims & Payments 5 Gathering Information 6 Review & Reconciliation 7 Debts 8 Transitional Arrangements Acronym List Keyword Index Act Section Index Site Map

Print this page Print this page    

3.1.5.100 Role of the ISO & Social Worker

Referral to the ISO

In some situations applicants/recipients may refuse or be reluctant to take action to receive child support (1.1.C.20) because of their cultural beliefs. Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander applicants/recipients should be referred to an ISO for a decision about exemption. If it is inappropriate for an ISO to be involved in a particular case, then it may be appropriate to involve the social worker.

Example: It may be inappropriate for ISO to be involved because of skin grouping.

 

Explanation: Cases should also be referred to the social worker where the applicant/recipient requests an exemption on the basis of a fear of violence or the father is unknown. Assessment of these cases can be undertaken jointly by the ISO and social worker.

 

Referral to the social worker

In some situations, applicants/recipients may refuse or be reluctant to take action to receive child support. They must be referred to a social worker; even if the interviewing officer is satisfied they should be granted an exemption.

Example: An applicant/recipient with a child born as a result of rape may give this information to the interviewing officer. Even though the applicant/recipient is eligible for a permanent exemption from seeking maintenance (1.1.M.10), the applicant/recipient should be referred to a social worker for an assessment of their situation and possible referral to support agencies.

 

Where an applicant/recipient is reluctant to take action for child support, the officer should try to obtain the reasons for this. The officer should explain the advantage of the CSS to the applicant/recipient and the requirements about taking reasonable action for child support. If the applicant/recipient is reluctant to talk about the reasons, they should be referred to a social worker.

 

Common role of the ISO & the social worker

The ISO and the social worker should ensure the applicant/recipient understands that:

  • child support is for the financial benefit of the child and the parent caring for the child,
  • child support improves the financial resources for children not living with both parents and can be received until the child turns 18 years,
  • children are entitled to receive support from both parents, and
  • child support does not have to involve contact between the parents.

 

The ISO or the social worker should fully explore with the applicant/recipient avenues of verifying the grounds for an exemption such as:

  • health professionals,
  • community agencies,
  • legal practitioners,
  • police,
  • relatives, or
  • friends.

 

A letter of verification from any of these sources should be obtained wherever possible.

 

The social worker should complete an electronic document (DOC) indicating:

  • the sources of verifying the grounds for an exemption, or
  • why verification is not possible, and
  • record the outcome of exercising their delegation for a request for a child support exemption.

 

Specific role of the social worker

Applicants/recipients may be more willing to discuss sensitive issues or disclose information to a social worker. The social worker may be able to:

  • obtain some information relating to the applicant/recipient which for personal reasons they are unwilling to divulge at the original interview,
  • alleviate any fears the applicant/recipient may have with regard to privacy,
  • refer the applicant/recipient for any other assistance needed, or
  • present the advantages of the CSS for children in a more positive light.

Example: The CSS is not linked with access issues and does not require personal contact between the parents.

 

Specific role of the ISO

When deciding to grant or not grant an exemption, the ISO should take into account the reason the applicant/recipient does not want to take action for child support and the likely impact on the applicant/recipient and/or their community if action for child support is taken.

 

In the case of remote Aboriginal applicants/recipients who do not have a pre-grant interview, the ISO should determine whether the payer (1.1.P.72) is likely to be in a position to pay child support. The ISO should seek advice from community contacts if necessary.

 

Policy reference: FA Guide 3.1.5.30 Taking Reasonable Maintenance Action, 3.1.5.70 Exemptions from the Maintenance Action Test

_______________________________________________________

Last reviewed: 1 December 2008


Previous
Previous
Top
Top
Next
Next





Page Url: ../../../../fag/faguide-3/faguide-3.1/faguide-3.1.5/faguide-3.1.5.100.html
Last Edited: 29/02/2012 2:37:40 PM


© Commonwealth of Australia, 2012 All rights reserved